ext_6576 ([identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] mindstalk 2008-03-29 10:52 pm (UTC)

Thanks.
Quick reply: tropics are larger than the poles? The poles themselves aren't much, but I thought the tundra/taiga area of Canada and Russia was pretty extensive. Top-heavy planet and all.

Yeah, ineffective photosynthesis is what I was thinking of -- that plus one ecologist saying that plants were actually 20% or more efficient at low light levels. Which is why I often think of CO2 extraction as the limiting factor... and thought that evening out the light supply would be a net productivity boon, after adjustment. Hadn't thought of dew though, never mind what rainfall would be like in this system.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org