Active Entries
- 1: first gazpacho or maybe V8
- 2: witnessed a bike crash
- 3: bikeshare rant, and library stuff
- 4: The power of one-lane streets
- 5: pastrami disappointment
- 6: things to be aware of
- 7: ebike under the rainbow
- 8: In which a dog attack gets me 40 dollars and maybe delayed trauma
- 9: Life by candle-light
- 10: some meal costs vs alternatives
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Style Credit
- Base style: Abstractia by
- Theme: White Lace by
no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 23:14 (UTC)From:My comments about the movie belong in the other post, but since this one is fresher:
- The lack of good science in ST doesn't really bother me and never has. Gene Rodenberry imagined it as a Wagon Train to the stars and I think the "sci-fi" setting allowed him to explore social issues in a way that was more palatable to a 1960's audience. I don't think it was ever much about the science.
-The "reboot" didn't bother me either. When you approach the level of major cultural icon/myth (as ST certainly is) then sticking to a continuity becomes extremely limiting and frustrating in its own way. I liken it to Superman who has been reinvented many, many times and appeared in dozens of unrelated incarnations including the latest: Smallville. But then maybe I just read too much fanfiction :)
As I said elsewhere: I'm about as hard core a ST fan as you can get without losing one's dignity (at least a dozen major conventions) and I loved it. It will be interesting to see what my dad thinks when I take him next week as he's a huge fan of the original series from first airing.