ext_123467 ([identity profile] notthebuddha.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] mindstalk 2011-09-04 06:26 pm (UTC)

Perhaps an argument for less plutocratic/oligarchic countries to avoid letting such robber barons arise in the first place.

That's why I advocated for transparency rather than a wealth cap.

The wealth isn't destroyed though, just distributed, so those people should be back to work soon enough.

You whole point is that money is too abusively effective in large enough piles. Dividing it into smaller piles inherently removes some of it's effectiveness, so wealth has to be destroyed if your plan is executed; this is even before percentages are raked off in the form of "legitimate" administrative expenses and inevitable graft, pork, corruption, etc.


Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org