mindstalk: (thoughtful)
mindstalk ([personal profile] mindstalk) wrote2007-10-28 11:12 pm
Entry tags:

Is pregnancy barbaric?

Thread at Feministe, on comments by radical feminist Shulamith Firestone in 1970. Comments spend a fair amount of time discussing Bujold, which warms my heart. One poster wonders if one's gut reaction toward uterine replicators (Bujold) or exowombs (Transhuman Space) is governed by prior exposure to Brave New World vs. Bujold.

[identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com 2007-10-30 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
There was a fair bit of material in the comments, including people disputing the claim, or questioning what "barbaric" even means. Plus some asking why Firestone was devaluing the one thing only women can do. But also a lot of women saying "it's great pregnancy is fun for some women, but dear god I'd love an exowomb rather than shitting out a pumpkin with permanent changes to my health."

As for singling out pregnancy, I infer that Firestone had a thesis of how pregnancy was a keystone of the social subjugation of women. Everyone shits, only women spend nine months dueling their fetus for control of their bone calcium, so you've got both specialization and intensity, vs. something everyone does which isn't that big a deal.

As apparently a radical rather than liberal feminist, she apparently had extreme positions of "pregnancy is treachery", while the pro-exowomb commenters said "of course no one should be forced to use one".

[identity profile] mlc23.livejournal.com 2007-10-30 06:04 am (UTC)(link)
Presumably the wide use of exowombs would mean the end of breastfeeding and associated health benefits since induced lactation ( so far) is rarely completely successful and skips the very early and critical colostrum producing phase.

[identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com 2007-10-30 06:09 am (UTC)(link)
That's a valid concern. OTOH, technology which was capable of building/growing a no-drawbacks exowomb might well have something more advanced to say about either induced lactation or 'synthetic' milk. If you can support a placenta in a machine, maybe you can grow mammary glands with immune backup, with the requisite hormonal manipulation.

This is mature biotech territory, but yeah...

(One of my problems with the Bujold books is how anyone with access to full medicine manages to die. They're demonstrated as being capable of replacing or growing any individual body part, as well as risky brain transplants to full clone bodies.)

[identity profile] mlc23.livejournal.com 2007-10-30 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Or we could have a wet-nurse revival if exo-womb techonology develops before milk substitute is developed. I can envision a scenario where having a lactating nanny would become a status symbol.