mindstalk: (thoughtful)
Thread at Feministe, on comments by radical feminist Shulamith Firestone in 1970. Comments spend a fair amount of time discussing Bujold, which warms my heart. One poster wonders if one's gut reaction toward uterine replicators (Bujold) or exowombs (Transhuman Space) is governed by prior exposure to Brave New World vs. Bujold.

Date: 2007-10-30 06:04 (UTC)From: [identity profile] mlc23.livejournal.com
Presumably the wide use of exowombs would mean the end of breastfeeding and associated health benefits since induced lactation ( so far) is rarely completely successful and skips the very early and critical colostrum producing phase.

Date: 2007-10-30 06:09 (UTC)From: [identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com
That's a valid concern. OTOH, technology which was capable of building/growing a no-drawbacks exowomb might well have something more advanced to say about either induced lactation or 'synthetic' milk. If you can support a placenta in a machine, maybe you can grow mammary glands with immune backup, with the requisite hormonal manipulation.

This is mature biotech territory, but yeah...

(One of my problems with the Bujold books is how anyone with access to full medicine manages to die. They're demonstrated as being capable of replacing or growing any individual body part, as well as risky brain transplants to full clone bodies.)

Date: 2007-10-30 21:12 (UTC)From: [identity profile] mlc23.livejournal.com
Or we could have a wet-nurse revival if exo-womb techonology develops before milk substitute is developed. I can envision a scenario where having a lactating nanny would become a status symbol.

Profile

mindstalk: (Default)
mindstalk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 45 67
89 10 1112 1314
15161718192021
222324 25262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-06-28 18:23
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios