Aka "Inara is raped! Zoe is raped! Kaylee is raped! Joss's wife is raped!"
Ah, radicals. Giving feminism a bad name since (insert year here).
From James Nicoll; funny comment here.
Ah, radicals. Giving feminism a bad name since (insert year here).
From James Nicoll; funny comment here.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 12:55 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 21:31 (UTC)From:It's a little like laughing at the idea of someone like Mike Huckabee as a presidential candidate, until you realize he was actually getting some 10-20% of the Republican vote.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 06:32 (UTC)From:...actually, looking at that one's interests and userpics, I suspect that very post is such a Sokal-troll.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 12:14 (UTC)From:a fellow browncoat put up a challenge to see who could write a post that was sarcastic but subtle enough to get past the screen (the woman who posted doesn't allow oppositional thought to be put up on her site - while writing very inflammatory entries - very nice). My bit of subtle irony (okay there were a couple case) is that I used an icon of Seung Mina who is a strong, yet scantily clad fighter from a vid game (there was a bit of ranting about strong women being dressed as sex objects).
so, yes, it WAS tongue-in-cheek.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 14:36 (UTC)From:Yeah, my sequences was something like
* wow, she's raving and dumb and radfemness wraps around to warped Christianity. I must tell everyone I know.
* Nah, James's thread is getting too long, I'll just tell my friends.
* You know, now that I've brought up the concept of Sokalling... is that a radfem icon? And was 'lude' over the top? Let's see if the journal and profile match the content.
* Journal, eh. Profile... dancing in underwear? Skinny dipping? Flirting? UU? -- okay, that could go either way, but I'm used to sex-pos ones. Sex? Firefly? And look, firefly userpics. And cog sci (personal bias), and Venn diagrams?
** Could a pro-logic, pro-sex, Hofstadter and Firefly fan be swept up to write that screed naturally? I believe people are complex, and anything is possible... but it's not how I'd bet. Let's ask! Obliquely, because allecto allegedly checks the journals of commenters for respectful attitudes.
And once I had the idea, things like "except to marry Wash, but that's not important" seemed suspicious.
Well done!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 19:40 (UTC)From:I am surprised that she didn't seem to do a background check on me because my profile is a bit of a give-a-way. I would also have been suspicious of the post in the first place because her entry is months old and the only folks posting to it right now are Firefly fans.
I got replies telling me how stupid I was, but allecto never unscreened them so they exist only in my email.
I will friend you and then you can friend me and you will see the rest of my journal :) If you look back just a couple of entries you will see one that is (tangentally) about Bloomington :) You can join my club of nuttiness because you seem like good people - and more people from Bloomington on my flist is gooood :)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 19:45 (UTC)From:qualudes, folks....qualudes....