mindstalk: (Default)
I will not be listing all the book titles I read in 2023, since there are (one SQL query later) 140 of them. But some highlights:

Language at the Speed of Sight. If you're interested in phonics vs. discredited alternatives and the science of learning to read, this is for you.

War and Human Civilization, Azar Gat. Repeatedly recommended by historian Bret Deveraux. Evolution of war and states.

Paved Paradise. Newer and shorter (than Shoup) book on how free parking wrecks American cities.

Carthage, Dexter Hoyos.

Squid Empire, Danna Staaf. Evolution of cephalopods.

God Delusion, Richard Dawkins. I still like it.

For fiction, I finally got into the Murderbot series, re-read Full Metal Alchemist, read Frieren (approaching 3x in the past couple months now), re-read the Lady Trent series and _The Steerswoman_, read the Avatar tie-in novels (though the second Yangchen novel was weaker.) read _I Favor the Villainess_ (but you can stop after the first two), and read several Apothecary Diaries. Also re-read Orphans of Raspay.

For yuri manga, which I track separately: Seagull Villa Days, and (ongoing) Blue Star on That Day.
mindstalk: (Default)
Speaking of old appliances: while my gas stove has sensible electric ignition, the gas oven apparently has to be lit with a lighter. Not even conveniently, you have to lift a metal bottom to get at the gas. Unclear if the ignition broke beyond repair or if this is by design. I am way less enthused about trying to use it now. (No baked potatoes?) Also, the dial for the oven gas was broken, though will be replaced... I'm just glad it got stripped in a gas-off position.

In addition to the Odyssey, I finished reading Voyage of the Dawn Treader. It's still fun, apart from the Christ Sledgehammer at the end. I noticed that Lewis gives Eustace something he's good at, botany -- though I don't think that ever contributed to the plot or solving a problem.

I remember as a kid reading about prisoners being fed bread and water, the ultimate in minimalist diet. Bread for food, water for drink, eh? It occurs to me that there's a good chance they also needed the water to make the bread edible: traditional bread goes stale quickly and I doubt prisoners were getting the fresh stuff... hell, you'd be happy if it were just stale and not moldy or wormy. This thought brought to you by my soaking a solid baguette to make it edible again.




I also finally finished reading Unearthly Powers, by Alan Strathern, a book my friend Amy had turned me onto. I was really slow, she not only finished before me but could have finished re-reading it before I did. To be short, it's about the differences between transcendent (otherworldly) and immanent (this-worldly) religions, and how a given faith may shift between those over time.

Immanentism – a form of religiosity oriented towards the presence of
supernatural forces and agents in the world around us, which are
attributed with the power to help or thwart human aspirations.

Transcendentalism
– a form of religiosity oriented towards the transcendence of mundane
existence and the imperative of salvation or liberation from the human
condition.

All religions have immanentism; some newer ones have transcendentalism as well.

As Amy put it, the book is also trying to explain why "world religions" went through "folk religions" like a hot knife through butter. I don't feel like trying to give a fair summary, but in addition to my old idea that just being a missionary religion gives you an advantage -- you keep trying, they don't, eventually you succeed -- Strathern talks about other differences: immanentist religions tend to be open and empirical in a sense, they're not trying to resist missionary activity, in fact priests and sacred kings may adopt or co-opt the new religion for various religions; OTOH once emplaced, transcendentalist philosophy tends to close the door behind it -- now drought or famine or failure in war aren't a sign of weak gods but a punishment or a test or a reminder to focus on salvation.
mindstalk: (lizsword)
I think I've read the Odyssey a bunch of times -- all in English translation, of course, I never got past one quarter of Ancient Greek. I think I read something as a kid, and know that I read the Fitzgerald translation twice since 2004. And now Wilson's.

I don't have much that's deep to say about it. I liked it. I was surprised at some things I didn't remember: all the ghosts of women who bore children to the gods, when Odysseus was in Hades, which seemed kind of random; how abruptly the story ends. Wilson's foreword has interest; she talks about being explicit that the slaves are slaves, and the length:

"My version is the same length as the original, with exactly the same number of lines. I chose to write within this difficult constraint because any translation without such limitations will tend to be longer than the original, and I wanted a narrative pace that could match its stride to Homer’s nimble gallop."

and her use of simple language:

"Homer’s language is markedly rhythmical, but it is not difficult or ostentatious. The Odyssey relies on coordinated, not subordinated syntax (“and then this, and then this, and then this,” rather than “although this, because of that, when this, which was this, on account of that”). I have frequently aimed for a certain level of simplicity, often using fairly ordinary, straightforward, and readable English. In using language that is largely simple, my goal is not to make Homer sound “primitive,” but to mark the fact that stylistic pomposity is entirely un-Homeric."

I also noted that the high body count of suitors in part due to divine interference; some of them had some regrets or scruples, but Athena decided all should die.
mindstalk: Tohsaka Rin (Rin)
Not much Mexico news today, I was indoors working to finish up being forced onto unpaid leave by Bureaucracy. I did go out for food, to my torta stand, getting a torta cubana (mmm) and a sincronizada. That's basically a US quesadilla plus ham and veg... also two tortillas, not one folder. To Mexicans the difference would be bigger, since their quesadillas use corn tortillas. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sincronizada

Totally unrelated, I've read The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, and Ozma of Oz. The first was meh, I'm neutral on it. I read it 5 years ago apparently, yet much of it sparked no recall.

Ozma, OTOH, was hilarious through much of the book. Man, that hen. Let me spam quotes and comments under a cut.

Read more... )
mindstalk: (Enki)
Stayed in Sunday and Monday due to snowing at near-freezing temperatures. The cold is one thing but I hate being around the possibility of ice. No, I didn't enjoy Boston winters, why do you ask? Plus I don't travel with snow boots, just crocs and shoes.

Yesterday was slightly nicer and I had a dental cleaning, plus some shopping, and going for shawarma. I rediscovered how *long* the wait to walk at Dufferin is. Toronto definitely not optimizing for pedestrian comfort. I also had two car scares on the shawarma walk: crossing Bloor, a truck tried to run the yellow light and would have been stuck in the intersection if we pedestrians hadn't waited to let it pass. And combing back, some other car left-turned into a driveway in a way I wasn't happy with.

It occurs to me that when Strong Towns and Not Just Bikes talk about stroads, they mostly use examples of suburban six+ lane roads with lots of parking lots and businesses (thus creating tons of intersecting paths and chances to hit someone.) It occurs to me that while urban streets are rarely so wide and fast and don't have quite so much parking, a fair number of them do have the proliferation of driveways and intersection risk.

Unrelatedly, I think I'd never actually run a dishwasher before staying at this place. Most places I've lived haven't even had a dishwasher. If they did, well, I live by myself and am used to washing up after meals, so I didn't use them. If staying with people who did have one, I might unload or load the thing, but left running it to the owners.

But my current hosts seemed really insistent that I use it rather than and wash, and there's no drying rack or scrub pad (though there's a brush), so I acquiesced. Actually ran it once without obvious problems. But the second time I used more soap, and... SUDS. Apparently you're not supposed to use dishwashing soap (which they do provide) in a dishwasher. Or more precisely there's hand dish soap and machine dish soap.

books: Shogun, Clavell. Long, decent. Simply dropped a plot point.
Circe, Miller. A re-read. Still good. Though Circe has a very inconvenient set of "weak god" powers.
Complete Persepolis. Had never read the second half.

Reading All the Birds in the Sky for a book group. Critics seem to have liked it a whole lot more than I am; I would have called it "poorly written" and "joyless", not a Locus and Nebula winner.
mindstalk: (buffy comic)
Have received my second Moderna. I moved my arms through the 15 minute waiting period, and walked around the park for an hour or so before daring to take the trains home rather than another Lyft. Late that evening I started to feel aches and blah, and I slept so-so with all the blankets on. Next day, I don't think I ever had a really high fever, but definitely slept a lot.

Coupled days of idleness after that, I'd felt fine at home, but I went for a 40 minute walk and it figuratively killed me (and became a 45-50 minute walk, not counting breaks). Got some nice Filipino food out of it, though.

In unrelated news I have ended up in a cutthroat leaderboard on Duolingo. The top score isn't that high, only 1269, not in the 2000s, but no one seems willing to fall into the demotion zone, and I'm struggling to stay neutral.

Books read:
Pyramids (Pratchett)
Bloom into you: Regarding Saeki Sayaka (all 3 volumes)
The Truth
Going Postal
Soul Music
mindstalk: (Nanoha)
My fiction reading has always been mostly SF/F. My mother hated that and would excoriate me for it, without giving a good sense of what I was missing. For my part I didn't have a clear idea of why my preferences went that way, other than being fascinated with cool worlds and magic, or something.

I'm currently re-reading Lolita with a friend, and am realizing a difference between the stuff I'm drawn to and the literary fiction I have read, guided in large part by gifts from my parents. And that difference is likable characters. Kind, possibly heroic, taking a non-sordid joy in life, people I might want to meet and walk with if they were real.

Lolita's Humbert could have been some kind and intellectually interesting person, tormented by his passion for 'nymphets', but instead he seems, so far, to be a shallow sociopath who doesn't really see any other humans as people.

Life Before Man
: the three main characters aren't horrible people, but memory says the book is dominated by their dreary adulterous love triangle. At least two of them are paleontologists working in a museum, but I recall no sense of joy and fun leavening the book.

Iain M. Banks: one of the most 'literary' of modern SF writers, and I don't think he's written a human character I like. Maybe Zakalwe, he at least has drive and verve. The human members of the utopian Culture all struck me as hopelessly grumpy, or shallow; technically they're all very nice and moral people but that didn't save them.  I keep saying 'human' because his AI characters are in fact charming and likable, altruistic and funny and having a purpose to their lives.

On the flip side, the one 'literary' author I regularly re-read is Jane Austen, with, hey presto! attractive and likeable main characters, especially Liz and Jane Bennett, or Anne Elliot, or Catherine and the Tilney kids from Northanger Abbey.

Favorite SF?  Some are Bujold, Pratchett, Steerswoman, Hodgell, Liaden.  Generally with kickass characters.  Least favorite Pratchett?  Nation, Dodger, Dark Side of the Sun -- weaker in attractive characters than Discworld or the Carpet People.

Not everyone is kind; I've liked most of Brust's books, and early Vlad, or Jack Agyar, aren't brimming with kindness and heroism.  Vlad's snarky and amusing, more so than Humbert Humbert. And, well, I don't actually re-read Agyar tons...

As books/plots I consider the Liaden books kind of candy, but re-reading them is great, because the members of Clan Korval are mostly great people.

mindstalk: (Default)
Nothing Special https://www.webtoons.com/en/fantasy/nothing-special/s3-episode-10/viewer?title_no=1188&episode_no=92
Was recommended by a friend last Sunday, I just finished up. Cute fantasy. Unusual format: each entry is a chapter of pages in vertical sequence, often doing odd things with comic space. I think someone read Understanding Comics.

Qualia the Purple. Was recommended as a deep concept SF yuri manga. That is not inaccurate. Was it good? I dunno: ending felt weak to me, and I was never deeply into the characters. Was it a trip? Oh hell yeah: cognitive science, quantum mechanics, optics, also references to anime like Nanoha and Monster and maybe Madoka. Apparently based on a novel, actually.

Alexander of Macedon, Peter Green. Don't recall how I heard of this. Was interesting and well written. I guess there are lots of different 'takes' on Alexander; this one was "genius war leader, great at tactics and improvisation and guessing what opponents would do, also superstitious murderous megalomaniac." Also lucky, he came close to dying multiple times. Native Persian infantry seems to have been horrible, at least by comparison to Macedonians or Greek mercenaries.

Alliance Rising, Cherryh's recent Alliance/Union novel. Felt a bit odd continuity-wise but I guess it's way earlier than anything else. I noticed that for much of the book very little had actually happened, just pages and pages of people *worrying*. I guess that's very Cherryh.

Possibly the worst person to be in a Cherryh novel is an honest and benevolent person, because no one else will be able to believe in and trust in you.
mindstalk: (books)
I re-read The Blue Sword and The Knot in the Grain by McKinley. Sword was once the most forgettable book I'd ever read; not that I hated it, but I literally forgot having read it, twice. It's very odd when your sense of deja vu itself triggers a sense of deja vu. I remember it more now. It's an engaging book, though I just now had the thought that the most powerful people in the Not!India Damar are white foreigners. The master mages Luthe, Agsded, Aerin's mother, Aerin herself... (well, she's half-Damarian but the paleskin redhead genes were strong.)

Knot was still fun, though I wouldn't say most of the stories are about anything, they're just like modern fairy tales. Though the titular story does have a nice portrayal of an uprooted teen finding a new community.

Invisible Agents by Nadine Akkerman, on female spies in 1640s England. Less about tradecraft, more about trying to even find evidence of them in the literature, and on attitudes toward such spies. Royalists were friendlier to their lady spies than Parliamentarians were to their paid commoners, but the Royalists also destroyed themselves in factional infighting. No strong recommendation.

An Empire of Air and Water, Siobhan Carroll, a friend from grad school. On portrayals of 'atopias', uncolonizable places, like poles, ocean, atmosphere, and underground, in British literature, followed by how those were used as metaphors for the complexity of London. Somewhat interesting. If you're not a fellow academic I recommend skipping or at least skimming the preface, which is largely "This is how my work is situated in the context of other people's work".

Currently reading Mary Beard's SPQR, already a strong recommendation. 2015 book on Roman history, so based on more data than anything in my childhood. I'll give one just bit: an interesting theme of foreigness or low origins in Rome's myths. Versions of the Romulus myth have him killing his brother, and recruiting people by offering asylum to slaves, criminals, and refugees; the Aeneas myth obviously has the proto-Romans as very foreign, and one later Roman contorted himself to somehow read 'aborigine' as "wanderers" rather than the obvious "ab origine", original inhabitants. Contrast to Greek polis myths that often had the people springing from the soil, and compare to Rome's unusual generosity in incorporating people (Beard says the freed slaves of Roman citizens themselves became citizens, which is new to me) vs. Greek tightfistedness.
mindstalk: (Default)
It's been a slow time. Partly from getting a cold last weekend. Colds hit me hard the first few days. Now I'm doing better but blowing my nose a lot.

Highlights:

* Bats! Went back to the Roma Street Parklands, saw lots of flying foxes around dusk, dipping into the pond. Apparently it's wetting their front fur, then they go hang and suck it off to drink.
* I watched "Your Name", it was pretty good, though I'm grumpy about the ending. And that's Shinkai's happiest ending...
* On the 8th I took the train down to Helensvale to visit E&A on their 12 acres of land; that was pretty fun, just hanging out and walking. Didn't sleep well though, foam mattresses aren't my thing and they have many chickens including roosters, so I fell asleep late and was woken around 4.
* Then E took me over to Griffith and I explored some of the Gold Coast. Got my feet wet in the Pacific!
* Read GRRM's Fevre Dream, aka Life On the Mississippi With Vampires.
* Took a bus trip outward, to explore more. It wasn't very exciting but I'm glad I tried. "LA with better transit or maybe selection bias" continues as an impression.
* 90% of everything closes by 9PM.
* Tried exploring Fortitude Valley and Central Station areas. There's a Chinatown but it's tiny and half-dead.
* Lots of public toilets. Some of them look creepy but none of them have smelled bad. Even Japan can't say that though I gave it a lot more chances to fail.
* Going by the store and my second host, Australia is big on instant coffee.
* Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) busways seems hardly less resource-intensive than subways. Big concrete busways and stations platforms and such. I guess the stations can be shorter.
* Go Card machines have terrible touchscreens.
* Re-read Lord of the Rings, first time since before 2004.
* Re-read Crispin's Zar Star Trek novels. Second one felt pretty dire at first but eventually got good.
mindstalk: (Default)
By Amin Maalouf. I finished this book last night. It's been highly recommended, and I liked it. Not too long, and fairly simple in structure: chronological, with Crusades arriving, getting fought, and finally kicked out. I found it an engaging read. Some surprises or sociological points:

Mercy cut for your reading page )
mindstalk: (books)
I finished Revolts. Farley is really good at writing thrillers. A friend's daughters get very excited watching tense movies or episodes, especially the youngest girl, even when they know the plot and outcome; youngest will get up to shake out tension, or hide from the TV, or cling to mother for comfort. I felt a lot like that reading this book, having to put down the book because eeeeeee. This despite the fact that if you describe the plot baldly, it's a ridiculous concatenation of unlikely setbacks.

Oh, and the plane did crash, but *not* because of the storm! Well played, Farley.

I'm currently reading the Black Stallion's Ghost, which I'm sure I did read, because I doubt there are two novels in the series with the Everglades, sawgrass, Seminoles, and twisted icons. I still recall nothing of the plot.
mindstalk: (kirin)
When I was very young I read a bunch of Walter Farley's Black Stallion novels. I even wanted to be a jockey, until I saw Feynman on TV and wanted to be a physicist, at around age 8.

I've just re-read the first two. They hold up decently. It helps to know, now, that those were written in the 1940s -- the first one published in 1941, when Farley was an undergraduate! Alec says 'Gosh' an awful lot, and there's an Italian immigrant straight from Central Casting (of the many bambinos, not Mafia, variety). The first book is part desert island survival, part settling in in Flushing, part "can we race?" I liked the second one more (Goodreads is divided on this point), it was quite high tension (like, put the book down at times because eeeeeee high tension) and didn't seem obviously insulting to the Arabs in it.

The second book also has an unresolved murder and I don't know if it's a loose plot point or simply "things happen that aren't about the protagonist but affect him anyway. It also has some unfortunate "ugly = evil" but that's not confined to 1940s writing.

Knowing the date of writing puts some things in context. The series starts with Alec on a steamship from India, while the second early on has a detailed flight of a flying boat -- not even a straight transoceanic one, but hopping from NYC, to Trinidad, to Brazil, to Liberia, and so on until Aden. Passengers stay in hotels between hops. This must have cost an awful lot of money...

I jumped ahead to The Black Stallion Revolts, which I doubt I ever read before, and the tension is high again: A&B are trying to go somewhere and I don't actually know if they'll get there -- sometimes travel trouble in Farley is just raising the stakes, and sometimes it kills almost everyone and change's the survivor's whole life.
mindstalk: Tohsaka Rin (Rin)
Some years ago, I read someone commenting on the ubiquity of servants in a well-off pre-appliance household, and how they were invisible in e.g. Jane Austen. This had given me the idea that they didn't appear at all. Now I'm re-reading Price and Prejudice for the first time in years, and while they don't appear as characters (so far, 1/5 in; I think some of Darcy's do when Lizzie visits Pemberley), they do in fact get mentioned a lot.

While Jane is sick at Bingley's, "a servant", "a housemaid", and his housekeeper are mentioned. There's also Nicholls, presumably his cooking, making white soup for a ball.

Mrs. Bennett mentions keeping servants, Mr. Bennett says he hopes she ordered a good dinner, she frostily assures Mr. Collins that they can keep a good cook, and "Lydia, my love, ring the bell—I must speak to Hill this moment."

Finally, on Collins' visit:

"During dinner, Mr. Bennet scarcely spoke at all; but when the servants were withdrawn,"

So they are invisible as people -- more so than in Game of Thrones, say -- but they and their services are acknowledged as existing.

As a contrast, Bilbo and Frodo don't seem to keep any servants other than the gardening service; not only are none mentioned, but both bachelors are mentioned in the context of doing housework themselves. Sam does go off to Crickhollow "to do for Mr. Baggins" but that seems more about Sam than Frodo actually needing or expecting a servant.

---
Spot the userpic pun!
mindstalk: (Earth)
I'm reading Factfulness: Ten Reasons We're Wrong About the World – and Why Things Are Better Than You Think by Hans Rosling, on the state of the world and people's misconceptions of it. It's kind of like Pinker's Enlightenment Now except with less Enlightenment crowing and I think fewer people distrust Rosling, and more about "so, why are people so wrong?" Because that's his first point: people are very wrong about how things are going in income distribution, life expectancy, child mortality, etc. Worse-than-random-chimps wrong. I can confirm in a small way: a Facebook poll of my friends regarding global life expectancy was mostly wrong.

Gapminder link

Wall o' text )
mindstalk: (rathorn)
2018 book count: 109 fiction, 26 non-fiction. I'd meant to read more non.

32 fiction with female main characters, 36 male, 25 other (both?), 16 unlabeled (most of those are Spice and Wolf, which I guess should be mostly 'male' in terms of 3rd person POV but Horo is so important I was reluctant to go that way. That or I was lazy with cut and paste.)

47 by female authors, 55 male, 20 other, 13 unlabeled. other definitely means male/female author pairs, like the Liaden series, while unlabeled tends to mean "I don't know", like for fanfics by authors with opaque names.
mindstalk: (Default)
I read Jemisin's Broken Earth Trilogy. It was good, though I'm not sure it really needed four Hugos in a row.

Dan Dennett's From Bacteria to Bach and Back was interesting as usual, though also as usual I'm not sure I came away with an actual story about consciousness.

The latest two Penric novellas were fun.

I found a novel length Bujold fic, A Bit Too Much Good Work; it's Captain Vorpatril's Alliance from the POV of Byerly and Rish. Enjoyed it a lot, and the author's other Vorrutyer or Arqua stories.

books

2018-09-12 19:05
mindstalk: (Default)
The whole Lady Trent series. I enjoyed re-read it, and some arc bits made more sense when I read them back to back.

_A Numerate Life_, John Allen Paulos. I've enjoyed his classic books (_Innumeracy_) but this grumpy memoir-skeptical memoir didn't have much IMO. It did have something though, an observation that almost no one is entirely normal.

Imagine that 90% of people are 'normal' on some dimension. Imagine that there are lots of mostly independent dimensions: height, IQ, sexual orientation, kink, family history, travel... if there are 10 such, then under 35% of people are normal on all dimensions. If 20 such, 12%. Up to you to decide how many ways you could characterize people, or how many of them to treat as normal.

_Port of Shadows_: years later, Glen Cook returns to the Black Company series, with an interquel, set after the first book. It was a gripping read, and possible inconsistencies were lampshaded within the text...
mindstalk: (Default)
If you have a whole series about a female protagonist, who is a thief, should the covers focus on her crotch to the literal exclusion of her face?

https://www.jonathanmoeller.com/writer/?page_id=5967
mindstalk: (Miles)
A common criticism of Lois Bujold is that some of her stories depend on some unlikely coincidence. Usually the writing is pretty tight and sensible otherwise, but there'll be one coincidence setting up the book's plot.

I've been on a kick of re-reading the Liaden books, maybe more accurately called the Korval series now (apart from two prequels with Liadens but no Korvals), and they chug coincidence like a caffeine addict. I've never seen anyone complain. I suppose it's so blatant you just take it with the books, along with all the protagonists being super-competent pilots-plus who achieve psychic soulbonded lifemating. (I stretch truth. Not all of them achieve lifemating. Just most of them.)

Also there's enough psychic magic reality warping bullshit that the coincidences could be due to a real thing in-universe. People even talk about Korval's 'luck', and between Cantra's Tanjalyre engineering, marrying far too many dramliz over the centuries, and the weakly godlike Tree, there are plenty of culprits.

I guess it's a case of a common pattern: something that has *one* flaw gets lots of criticism. Something with lots of flaws? Give it a pass if you pay attention to it at all.

(The Korval books are lots of fun, easy reads, and I've noticed recently, draw on some rather obscure real vocabulary. But I can't view them as other than power-fantasy romance candy.)

Profile

mindstalk: (Default)
mindstalk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 45 67
89 10 1112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-06-23 06:07
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios