Date: 2006-12-20 09:18 (UTC)From: [identity profile] purpletigron.livejournal.com
With current agricultural technology, and diet patterns, the Earth can support up to 9 billion people with land-grown food. Of course, sea grown food is currently significant. But the collapse of fisheries makes that unreliable.

Date: 2006-12-20 14:35 (UTC)From: [identity profile] wizwom.livejournal.com
I think it's been shown that aquaculture is a viable commercial endeavor. I'd imagine most of the shallow seas given over to farmed seaweed, using dredge from under fish-farms as fertilizer.

Date: 2006-12-20 16:48 (UTC)From: [identity profile] purpletigron.livejournal.com
Industrial-scale aquaculture potentially hits the wall with ecological viability.

http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/what_we_do/marine/problems/aquaculture/

Date: 2006-12-20 17:00 (UTC)From: [identity profile] wizwom.livejournal.com
Well, as I said, sea farming - not domesticated fish farms, but seaweed, plant farming - in shallow seas.

The fish farms, in order to be economically viable ought to be of scecies which are reasonable deep-water species - tuna, salmon, macarel. They should include a "waste catch" under the fish pen, and not be placed in shallom areas (since shallow areas are good for planing seaweed, of course).

I realize this is not the current situation, but it's not a hard situation to envision.

Profile

mindstalk: (Default)
mindstalk

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3
45 6 7 8 910
11 12131415 1617
18 19 2021 222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit

Page generated 2026-01-26 20:38
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios