This is worth calling out from the previous post: look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic-related_death_rate and sort by the various columns. In particular the third one, road deaths per billion vehicle-km. US is 7.3, Japan is 6.4, not hugely better. Most rich countries are better, down to 3.4 (UK) or Norway (3.0) Many rich countries are least 1/3 better than the US (5.1 or lower).
So when we talk about the 40,000 car crash deaths a year in the US, and how preventable they are, there are two dimensions: reducing the amount driven, by increasing density and mass transit and bikeability, and improving the safety of cars as they are driven, by I don't know what means exactly but roads can clearly have only 40% the death rate of US ones.
Between the two, well, Canada and Australia (large car-loving countries like the US) have less than half the road deaths per capita of the US, so 20,000 American deaths/year are easily preventable. Looking at the UK or Nordic countries, 30,000 deaths/year are preventable.
So when we talk about the 40,000 car crash deaths a year in the US, and how preventable they are, there are two dimensions: reducing the amount driven, by increasing density and mass transit and bikeability, and improving the safety of cars as they are driven, by I don't know what means exactly but roads can clearly have only 40% the death rate of US ones.
Between the two, well, Canada and Australia (large car-loving countries like the US) have less than half the road deaths per capita of the US, so 20,000 American deaths/year are easily preventable. Looking at the UK or Nordic countries, 30,000 deaths/year are preventable.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-06 13:41 (UTC)From:I was imagining that mass transit, etc., could be key because in many American towns if you don't have a car you're mostly not much going places you otherwise would have so people might drive when they oughtn't but I'd have naively thought Japan's mass transit excellent.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-06 18:40 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2019-08-07 06:35 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2019-08-07 06:52 (UTC)From:I did find a building that seemed to be storing a huge number of identical plain cars or small trucks. Still, feels like they can't explain that much.
Also state by state variation
Date: 2019-08-06 14:29 (UTC)From:Re: Also state by state variation
Date: 2019-08-07 07:04 (UTC)From:Re: Also state by state variation
Date: 2019-08-07 13:14 (UTC)From:I'm not sure what you are looking at. The first link only gives numbers per 100,000 people. The two sets for using auto deaths per 100,000 look pretty similar to me. One says 5.1 for MA and the other says 4.9. Am I misreading the data?
Re: Also state by state variation
Date: 2019-08-07 14:13 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2019-08-06 15:55 (UTC)From:I'd guess that higher density would generally correlate with lower maximum legal speeds, which would hit both dimensions at once.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-06 18:43 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2019-08-06 19:49 (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2019-08-06 23:49 (UTC)From:(But http://infographic.statista.com/normal/chartoftheday_5504_the_worst_countries_in_the_world_for_drunk_driving_n.jpg claims S Korea is much lower in drunk driving than the US, which is a bit lower than Canada, so that doesn't work.)
https://www.worldnomads.com/travel-safety/eastern-asia/south-korea/traffic-the-amazing-race suggests that driving practices are just that aggressive. Another article said SK had reduced its deaths by more than half... *down* to the deaths/100,000 people in the wikipedia table.
https://kojects.com/2015/11/04/traffic-accidents-in-korea/ also gives "dangerous behavior", distinct from speeding, ignoring signals, or tailgating, as the main reason. It also mentions high legal urban speeds.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-07 00:35 (UTC)From:I also wonder if US drivers are simply worse than drivers in the EU. As for speed, wikpedia mentions that urban speeds in SK are 60-80 kph, so I think a major factor is how this actually breaks down - 60 kph isn't that much higher than most US urban speeds, but 80 definitely is.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-07 03:43 (UTC)From:US driving habits don't seem that bad. Lowering speed limits, traffic calming, and enabling less driving would be the low hanging fruit.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-07 04:25 (UTC)From:Sure, but they seem possible by 2030, and that's the earlier that I'd expect any change in driver education to have a notable impact on auto deaths/