mindstalk: (riboku)
I started reading this Japan book I got from Boskone (This Country Japan [Edward Seidensticker]); turns out to be a lot of disconnected essays. First one is about the use of nature and seasons in art, especially the Tale of Genji. Japanese art tends to be very specific, with recognizable plants, not just general foliage. Likewise, for a harem story, Genji is very aware of the seasons... though people die in a suspiciously symbolic pattern. By contrast, despite characters strolling a lot, Austen and Dickens mark nature only when (in)convenient, like preventing travel or providing a good time for a picnic.

Second essay is on Japanese conservatism: they import and imitate a lot, but don't throw out their old stuff. Still reading.
mindstalk: (I do escher)
Hanging out on /r/fanfiction recently, I've run across multiple people who hate 1st person narrators. This baffles me, like "I won't read books by women" or "I won't read books with a girl lead". There are so many great 1st POV books out there, including seminal works of the genre or its penumbra as well as 'literature': Frankenstein, Dracula, Sherlock Holmes, the parts of Moby Dick that aren't pure infodump, Amber, Night in the Lonesome October, Vlad Taltos, Book of the New Sun, Huckleberry Finn, A Connecticut Yankee, Sunshine, Heart of Darkness, the Farseer trilogies, Hundred Thousand Kingdoms, Bertie Wooster, Hunger Games, Ancillary series, Black Company, 20,000 Leagues... and multiple high quality fanfics.

(Also my own Nanoha fics but I make no claims for the quality of those.)
mindstalk: (Default)
Somehow I found myself at this trove, and reading some of his essays.
http://orwell.ru/library/books/htm_file/024

"Wells, Hitler and the World State", on Wells being trapped in his own past, unable to see the marriage of 'science' and barbarism as revealed in Hitler's Germany

"Rudyard Kipling", on 'good bad poetry', that says the obvious in a memorable way; Kipling being Conservative in the old sense, looking up to authority, while Orwell says all current Conservatives were really Liberals, Fascists, or Fascist sympathizers; Kipling being racist and imperialist and all but with an idea of responsibility and an attachment to defined action unlike a permanent opposition.

"Raffles and Miss Blandish", on the genteel crime fiction of Raffles, gentleman thief, who had no morals but did have standards, vs. the sadistic brutality of _No Orchids for Miss Blandish_ in the American style.

"Boys' Weeklies": magazines as truer and more specific guides to popular taste than oligopolistic broadcast media or expensive novels; older weeklies full of detailed school fantasies, crap writing, and ensembles of equal boys, vs. news ones with better writing, adventure stories (Wild West! Frozen North! Mars!) and hero or bully worship. Also women's weeklies, more realistic seeming stories -- urban jobs, sex, also short stories instead of long serials -- but with their own fantasy of a higher income. Magazines as Conservative propaganda, inculcating a particular worldview; why no left-wing weeklies, like Spanish ones where "police chasing an anarchist" would be from the POV of an anarchist?

Profile

mindstalk: (Default)
mindstalk

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
1819202122 23 24
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-05-29 16:39
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios