Active Entries
- 1: pastrami disappointment
- 2: things to be aware of
- 3: ebike under the rainbow
- 4: In which a dog attack gets me 40 dollars and maybe delayed trauma
- 5: Life by candle-light
- 6: some meal costs vs alternatives
- 7: stainless steel convert
- 8: One mask forward, two masks back
- 9: welp, SWG Discord
- 10: packing philosophy
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Style Credit
- Base style: Abstractia by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
chiming - Theme: White Lace by
no subject
Date: 2008-03-29 22:52 (UTC)From:Quick reply: tropics are larger than the poles? The poles themselves aren't much, but I thought the tundra/taiga area of Canada and Russia was pretty extensive. Top-heavy planet and all.
Yeah, ineffective photosynthesis is what I was thinking of -- that plus one ecologist saying that plants were actually 20% or more efficient at low light levels. Which is why I often think of CO2 extraction as the limiting factor... and thought that evening out the light supply would be a net productivity boon, after adjustment. Hadn't thought of dew though, never mind what rainfall would be like in this system.