Active Entries
- 1: first gazpacho or maybe V8
- 2: witnessed a bike crash
- 3: bikeshare rant, and library stuff
- 4: The power of one-lane streets
- 5: pastrami disappointment
- 6: things to be aware of
- 7: ebike under the rainbow
- 8: In which a dog attack gets me 40 dollars and maybe delayed trauma
- 9: Life by candle-light
- 10: some meal costs vs alternatives
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Style Credit
- Base style: Abstractia by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
chiming - Theme: White Lace by
no subject
Date: 2009-05-27 04:57 (UTC)From:The CA Supreme Court didn't really have any choice -- what they did was the legally correct thing to do. Allowing the marriages that had taken place to remain legally valid was pretty progressive, IMO, though I don't know the technicalities. It just means there's going to be some ridiculous year-to-year voter initiative in CA voting for constitutional amendments legalizing/forbidding gay marriage. Which is silly, but what will happen.