![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Stats I don't have are on how representative his horror stories are: he got lots of complaints, he showed us people being bankrupted or denied treatment, and health care workers and doctors testifying as to how they're paid better to deny treatment (vs. the British doctor getting paid more for getting patients to stop smoking, or get low blood pressure in the pool), but how many insured Americans do run into such problems? Of course, even those who don't still get the experience of being afraid to be unemployed for a while, or to start a small business, due to the high expense of individual insurance if you can even get it.
He actually didn't make some of the standard financial arguments for universal care. He touched on such systems paying for preventive care, and thus having lower total costs than ER-based care (the US *has* government mandated universal care, really, with ERs having to take in anyone; it's just a really inefficience and ineffective form of care) but not that heavily, and didn't say anything private insurers having high overhead, plus the billing overhead doctors have to deal with, nor the point that insurance works better the bigger the pool that risk is spread among.
Note when I think of universal health care, I think of "Medicare for all", not the epicyclic mandates and subsidies of existing insurers that the leading Democratic contenders talk about, and which HR Clinton was into the first time around, or a couple of states have done (Vermont (Howard Dean) and Massachusetts). Yay, insurance, but you're still dealing with inefficient denial happy profit-driven bureaucracies; much of Sicko is about the insured who get screwed anyway, not the uninsured.
[1] Huh, just noticed James dropped http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/ from his Usenet sig.