Date: 2012-04-19 12:48 (UTC)From: [personal profile] mindstalk
mindstalk: (Default)
I don't know what you're saying about locomotives, but you do have a point that 3x as many trains would mean 3x as much wear on the rails and bed. But those are constructed very differently from roads, out of different materials, so I'm not sure what that means in practice; the article indicated the potential for damage is greatly increased by building roads cheaply enough to get damaged in the first place, then exacerbated by weather.

So if rail building costs dwarf labor costs dwarf maintenance costs, and do so even at frequency, then the claim stands, vs. buses where running 3x as frequently comes closer to tripling your bus-specific costs.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

mindstalk: (Default)
mindstalk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 45 67
89 10 1112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-06-17 09:51
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios