mindstalk: (lizsword)
Tolkien has memorable women but not very many of them. They don't interact with each other much; in a lifetime of work the number of scenes that *might* pass the Bechdel test can be counted on one hand. Even dropping the "talk not about a man" requirement, just having two women talking at all, leaves us needing only two hands, I'm pretty sure. No woman with a role has a sister.

Also many of the women have a strong pedestal effect, from Idril and Luthien in 1917 to Galadriel in revisions shortly before his death.

GRRM in ASoIaF, despite writing about societies arguably worse for women than anything Tolkien put in the spotlight, has female characters up the wazoo, as POV characters, and interacting: talking, squabbling, plotting, running, using what power and influence they can even in a sexist society. I assume there's plenty of full Bechdel test passing, though I haven't read the books enough to safely assert it, and a lot of things the women would have to talk about would involve a man in some way.

I hate sweeping explanations in general, but have always found "a product of his time" a real copout when it comes to Tolkien. However, I ran into a more interesting version recently: product of his family.

Tolkien's mother died early, he had no sisters, was raised by a Catholic priest, and produced only one daughter. His adult life was dominated by WWI war experience and being a professor in early 1900s British colleges. It would seem that women were genuinely not very present in his life. As for the pedestal, he might have gone straight from "dead mother" to "Edith who will wait for me to be able to marry her despite my guardian's objections."

GRRM has two younger sisters. That's already a huge change in experience: not just one sister, but two of them, to highlight women not being the same. Wikipedia adds that he grew up in a house "belonging to his great-grandmother" which implies she was alive for part of his childhood, probably in addition to his mother, and who knows about grandmothers. His own adult life has been fantasy writing, SF fandom, and screenwriting, all of which have non-vanishing numbers of women. Well, I'm not sure about screenwriting, but film/TV production will have women somewhere in the process, if only as actors.

I would bet that having sisters by no means prevents a man from putting his love interest on a pedestal, but I would bet it at least reduces the chances of "What a Perfect Creature is Woman", what with seeing your sisters fight, annoy you, get sick, suffer cramps, head for the bathroom, get up with bedhead, etc.

So yeah. I wouldn't want to go to town to defend this idea, because people are individuals who make their choices, but the idea that women were in fact quite rare in Tolkien's lived experience, and not in GRRM's, seems worth pondering.

And for people who want to argue that the representation of women in Tolkien isn't a problem, this is undermined by evidence that *Tolkien* eventually thought it was a problem, with him writing a lot more women after LotR, and changing Haleth to a woman (without any romantic or reproductive plot that would require her to be one.)

Relevant links: https://mindstalk.dreamwidth.org/346625.html

https://www.reddit.com/r/tolkienfans/comments/g8df1p/hi_lady_tolkein_fans_how_do_you_feel_about_his/fonoqg1/

links

2019-04-21 00:22
mindstalk: (Default)
Communities need walkability https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2016/8/4/want-community-build-walkability

Tor.com analysis of Eowyn, including earlier text where she was more accepted as a leader and Aragorn's only love interest. https://www.tor.com/2019/04/04/exploring-the-peoples-of-middle-earth-eowyn-shieldmaiden-of-rohan/

Analysis of Miriel, Feanor's mom. https://www.tor.com/2019/03/07/exploring-the-people-of-middle-earth-miriel-historian-of-the-noldor-pt-1/

And his wife! https://www.tor.com/2019/02/21/exploring-the-people-of-middle-earth-nerdanel-called-the-wise/

Great white sharks flee orcas https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/04/great-white-sharks-flee-killer-whales/587563/

Medieval people tried to keep clean, but clergy didn't. https://aeon.co/essays/medieval-people-were-surprisingly-clean-apart-from-the-clergy
(OTOH there's some passage complaining about the Danes washing their hair and stealing English women.)

Sansa Stark as Gothic heroine, plus what that even means. https://www.tor.com/2019/04/18/the-gothic-and-game-of-thrones-part-i-the-burial-of-sansa-stark/

What the Mona Lisa probably looks like under the grime and yellowed varnish: https://matiasventura.com/post/the-colours-of-the-mona-lisa/ (Prado copy) and http://www.lumiere-technology.com/Pages/News/news3.htm (digital de-varnishing)

Racist history of zoning https://medium.com/@ABetterCAF/why-we-keep-saying-us-zoning-laws-are-the-legacy-of-racism-eee64e58e337

Microwave weapons are a failure https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/high-power-microwave-weapons-start-to-look-like-dead-end/
mindstalk: (science)
Someone claims to have made a breakthrough with the Voynich manuscript: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-26198471 also http://stephenbax.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Voynich-a-provisional-partial-decoding-BAX.pdf
The reports introduced me to an idea for it that I hadn't noticed before: that it's a book in an novel script in an extinct language. That would sound romantic on its own, but compared to "massive hoax" or "medieval RPG manual" it feels almost banal. In his paper Bax notes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rongorongo the undeciphered script of Easter Island, and the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glagolitic_alphabet which isn't undeciphered but had a rocky early period and could easily have died out leaving us some book in a weird script and extinct Slavic dialect.

I also wondered "what if we had an Iliad-class epic in Linear A?"

There's also undeciphered texts, like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohonc_Codex
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_N_176
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore_Stone
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Starving_of_Saqqara

Rohonc is most like Voynich, including in being suspected of being a hoax.

In reading around, I stumbled upon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugtun_script which is a Yupik syllabary created in five years by Uyaquk, who like Sequoyah of Cherokee fame, started out as an illiterate. (Five years? Between this and Vai, Sequoyah starts to seem slow.) Unlike the Cherokee script, it didn't take off, and having a Bible translation in "what the hell is this" seems a plausible outcome.

***

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundaland mentions some new work claiming people were on the SE Asian continental shelf aka Sundaland 50,000 years ago, with much older populations, and SE Asian culture starting there before sea level rise kicked them off; the Polynesian culture says Y chromosome + mitochondiral DNA shows 'Taiwanese' migrants move into existing Melanesian populations. Given that people were in Australia 40-60,000 years ago, people north of there seems like a no-brainer...

***

Disney princesses as Game of Thrones characters. http://www.buzzfeed.com/ariellecalderon/disney-princesses-as-game-of-thrones-characters
Related fanart:
http://laughingsquid.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/20130924-15541250-lannisterlions.jpg
http://hbowatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/house_baratheon.jpg
http://hbowatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/house_stark.jpg
https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/f6520061f08acfa0fb3fdb01513ff969/tumblr_mk4x90lRwU1qa5wxio1_500.jpg

***

Finns are pushing an initiative for gay marraige. I got excited, until I learned that all it does is push a bill into the legislature, where it can die in committee just like any other bill; it's not an initiative for a referendum, as in Switzerland or US states. Lame!

***

Venezuela is exploding.
http://caracaschronicles.com/2014/02/20/the-game-changed/
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2014/02/nicolas_maduro_s_venezuela_erupts_in_violence_the_venezuelan_president_appears.html
mindstalk: (Default)
(spoiler safe, especially if you've seen the series or read the first few books)

Someone pointed out something distinctive about A Song of Ice and Fire: http://awoiaf.westeros.org/index.php/A_Game_of_Thrones#Viewpoint_Characters
Look at the POV characters, for this and later books (though later lists have spoilers): largely women, children, underlings, or underdogs (dwarfs, bastards, knights with missing hands...) Half women in the first book, plus boy, youth, dwarf, and Ned. Second book is the same list, with Davos (underling) and Theon (jerk, and hoo boy) replacing Ned. Book 3 replaces Theon with Sam and Jaime, and we're starting to tilt male, but not males in charge. 4 gets back to parity, with lots of characters even my spoiler reading has told me little about; I don't know if underling/underdog is holding up. Book 5 has 16 POVs, wtf, not counting bookends, and only 5 are women. Some of those men are very high ranking (Lord Captain, Lord Commander), but still not *top* ranking.

Apart from Ned, *none* of the kings or lords in charge get a POV: Robert, Drogo, Renly, Stannis, Robb, Tywin, Lord Martell, Balon, Euron, Mance... closest would be Jon after his ascension, or a Lord Regent who gets the book 5 Epilogue.

I'd wondered why Robb never gets a POV, unlike all of his siblings but the 3 year old (even the foster one); "because he's 'King'" seems a good answer. The Game of Thrones is told from the POV of the pieces, not the players. Or at least not the male players.
mindstalk: (lizsword)
No spoilers before the cut.

I've called the Game of Thrones / Song of Ice and Fire series a long advertisement for democracy. I've since wondered if there's any hope of such reform within the world. I don't know where Martin's going, but if one wanted to write fanfic with a happy democratic ending, is there any potential for doing so without doing horrible injustice to the canon and making stuff up?

Short answer: yes! There's actually more potential than there's been written for, say, Barrayar.

Spoilers for I don't know, so best to assume everything through A Dance of Dragons. If you care, stay out. S, that means you!

Read more... )
mindstalk: (Default)
After avoiding this series for length and grimness and ramblingness, I've finally been sucked in. I blame my friends: they got into the HBO series, then the books -- partway; they've read the first two books and are watching the second series now. I've seen a bit, and started watching season 1 yesterday when I was alone in the house. (It is NOT FOR KIDS.) It is interesting, and I also sort-of-read part of the book, more finding scenes in it to see differences (lots!) or clarification (who was that?) OTOH, I know enough to know I may not want to Read Them All -- actually, I'm happily plundering Tropes and Wiki spoilers, both for worldbuilding details in compact form, and to see if the characters are like get killed or abused too much. This means I in some ways know more than my friends, and have to watch what I say.

I keep calling the series one long advertisement for democracy; they agree.

It's well acted, and I'm told GRRM has lots of screenwriting experience, and may in fact still be better at it, so the serie sis arguably tighted and more coherent. I have no comment; my other association with GRRM is Wild Cards.

Remember me asking whether Hobb or Martin was more grim? I note more similarities now: both are highly political fictions, with fairly subtle magic now, that's remnants of a stronger magic in the past, cut down by catastrophe, but returning.

Also, I can agree with my commenters: Martin's more grim. Character death *and* torture. Hobb's mostly about the torture.

I also re-read this critique of how women are treated in the series, which was depressing, and doesn't seem entirely unfair, though I know from wiki that one negative element gets reversed.

Nice music.

Current thoughts: I'll keep watching with my friends, may not seek it out otherwise.
mindstalk: (lizqueen)
Hilarious, or hilariously unfair?
http://tigerbeatdown.com/2011/08/26/enter-ye-myne-mystic-world-of-gayng-raype-what-the-r-stands-for-in-george-r-r-martin/

A NOTE ON ARRANGED MARRIAGE and CHILDREN: Yes, it’s true; in Ye Olde Medieval Europe, female tweens were oft wed to the grown-ups. A Song of Ice and Fire is known for being “gritty” and “authentic,” so really, aren’t I just objecting to the realism? Reader, here are the things that George R. R. Martin changed about Ye Olde Medieval Europe, when he set out to write A Song of Ice and Fire: Religion. Geography. History. Politics. Zombies. Werewolves. Dragons. At one point, when asked why his characters were taller, healthier, and longer-lived than actual Medieval people, George R. R. Martin explained that human genetics and biology do not work the same way in Westeros as they do in the real world. So George R. R. Martin considered that he could change all of that while maintaining “authenticity.” Here’s what he left in, however: Institutionalized pedophilia.

From comments:

Basically, I am convinced the reason these books are so popular is because male nerds identify with the characters who get killed off, thus affirming their martyrdom complex. And female nerds identify with the one character who is going to be fine, while getting to watch women who are all the things they’ve been criticized for not being get punished.


So when I got the fifth book, I decided to actually keep a rape count, counting only “new” and “actual” rapes, i.e. not threats and not references to previous rapes. The count was 23, in case anyone wants that stat for their own bashing-head-against-brick-wall arguments with Dudes.

Comments here http://heron61.livejournal.com/735105.html take issue with the above.

Profile

mindstalk: (Default)
mindstalk

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-05-22 21:21
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios