mindstalk: (atheist)
In my experience, most agnostics are practically atheist. They don't believe in god or afterlife, they're not praying, they're not worrying about it all. There are exceptions, from the occasional "agnostic theist" to a more common agnostic who is "seeking", or struggling, or wistfully wishing X was true, or on their way from being Christian to being atheist. But even those could largely be seen as functionally not-theist.

Conversely, most atheists are philosophically agnostic. Some do say that they've proved God can't exist, or think that has been proven, but most, if pressed, will disclaim certainty. They don't need it, being happy with implausibility rather than impossibility, because their (our) key argument is not "I know you're wrong" but "there's no evidence that you're right."

So if the bulk of atheists and agnostics overlap, why pick one label over another? Part of it is beliefs about what the definitions are, or what "belief in no God" means: countless times I've seen agnostics say that they're not atheist because that would be claiming certainty "just like a believer", immediately followed by atheists saying "no, you've missed the point." Part of it's personal history and what one is comfortable with for subrational reasons; in my case, I once as a child answered that I was agnostic out of cowardice and promptly got called on it[1], leading to a vow to not sell out again.

But there's also what message you're sending. Agnostics aren't the only ones who think 'atheist' means faith-like certainty in non-existence, for believers often respond that way too. But that's not the only message in play -- what message does calling yourself 'agnostic' send, and is it one atheists would want? To my mind, agnostic isn't just making a philosophical point about lack of certainty, but says that various religions have a real chance of being right, that there's a level playing field between atheism, Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Scientology, Hinduism, Jainism, Shinto, Sioux beliefs, Mbuti beliefs, etc. Well, maybe most agnostics would balk at some point in that list, but certainly level playing field between atheism and Christianity is often implied, or at least inferred by me. And then the atheist asks why one should stop at any point on the list.

Whereas the atheist uncertainty is more on the order of "there's no proof the Sun will rise tomorrow; the laws of physics are just observed patterns which *could* be a big coincidence." A philosophical point, not a practical one. The message the atheist really wants to send is "So, what's your evidence, anyway? I'm sorry, let me rephrase, what's your *convincing* evidence? Why should I take Jesus any more seriously than Zeus, or than you yourself take Brahma or Mohamed? You don't believe in Islam, well, I don't believe in Islam *or* Christianity." Do you (for agnostics) really think general Christianity, Mormonism, Scientology, Shinto, and the latest cult are on a level playing field, and if not, if you feel able to rule out some of those, why not all of them?

Core agnostic message: "I don't know", with room to infer "and maybe I can be convinced."  Atheist message: "I may not KNOW, but damn am I skeptical."  Often with "and I've looked at other religions, and for that matter your own religion, more than you have" as a followup.

Of course, this all assumes that truth-value is relevant, as opposed to social-utility value.

[1] It was on the schoolbus, 8th grade probably. For some reason I got asked what my religion was, and surrounded by a bunch of not overly friendly kids, I said agnostic, despite thinking of myself as atheist. They asked what agnostic meant, and another kid answered "it's what atheists answer when they don't want to say they're atheist." Which isn't true in general, but was really specifically true of me, and I burned with shame.

Date: 2007-11-03 20:50 (UTC)From: [identity profile] tooth-and-claw.livejournal.com
Mostly just following along with the conversation, but this:

Take Europe for example. Not very religious

Made my go Wurp? I will say that europe is not strongly *Christian*, in that I think they get a much bigger melting pot of religions, but Europe (at least what I can see, currently residing in it) is pretty damn religious.

At least, Italy is, but Zurich, Prague and Barcelona all shut down completly on Sundays as well, and I've gotten cursed for wearing a penacle hear than anywhere I've been in the US, including fundie-towns.

Date: 2007-11-03 20:58 (UTC)From: [identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com
Interesting. I'd have thought the US has more religions running around, though Europe has a larger Muslim minority. And maybe more Hindus, in England.

"not religious" is usually based on polls, where Europeans attest to various beliefs far less than Americans. And politicians don't talk about God or their beliefs, and sex attitudes sound saner, and such.

Shutting down on Sundays: is that people actually going to church, or people refusing to work on Sunday? Maybe less "we're religious" and more "we like our day off". Like France going on vacation for August... I also know various countries still have state churches or state-funded churches. The Queen is the head of the Church of England, after all. So there's more religious residue, but less belief or believing practice, at least in some areas.

Sucks about the pentacle curses.

Date: 2007-11-05 11:18 (UTC)From: [identity profile] tooth-and-claw.livejournal.com
It depends on the country. Italy has a lot of relgions floating around right now because it's one of the primary immigration points in europe at the moment (to the annoyace of the locals), but the primary religion is, of course, Catholcism. I would say that the same amount of people are religious here and elsewhere, if not more here. Having not lived in other european countries I can't say what they are like, but in Italy, even in a *very* liberal city like Florence, you had better watch that you don't take the lord's name in vain on the street, and there are strict dress codes for a lot of places.

The biggest difference seems to be that Europeans, at leats italians, are *just* as religious, just ot as loud-mouthed about it. Priorities are different, too. There isn't an obsession about virginity and abstinence here, but you can bet your ass if you get pregnant, you're keeping it, and NO WAY do you live in sin. In fact, near 50 percent of the population 25-30 still live with their parents. Honor thy mother and father is real big, too. Gays? sure, if they don't mind being terrorized.

Sunday is not just a day off. Certainly, lots of people take it that way, but many of them spend their mornings in church. the bells are actually what I rely on to get me up on Sunday mornings. All Saints Day and the Annunciation are major national holidays.

As for 'pagan' religions, I've never ever met someone who would come close to professing they believe in them here. Germany, I hear, is much more open to that.

Lastly, sexual politics are HORRIBLE over here. HORRIBLE. This is something that I think is pretty much an Italian issue, but women's rights stink. Aside from the constant, *constant* cat-calling, there is not a female classmate that I know who has not been sexually molested on the bus, and several now have more nasty stories (ike being followed and grabbed, or having someone sit across from you in the train and openly masturbate). This is the country that let a man off with a lighter sentence in a rape case because the girl wasn't a virgin, and another man was let go entirely because the courts ruled that you can't rape someone wearing tight jeans.

And yet, there are more female bus drivers, doctors, police officers, construction workers and street cleaners.

It really seems like relgion isn't a huige subject here, ot because people aren't religious, but because they are A. more pragmatic about it and B. they all live in it. It's tradition. Why muck around with it?

It's a different from the fanaticism we see in America. Of course, if you follow the European view on that, it's because all Americans are basically teenagers-- passionate, loud, not very bright, freindly, but very black and white.

Date: 2007-11-05 15:03 (UTC)From: [identity profile] pompe.livejournal.com
In my corner of Europe Sundays aren't very sacred at all. Most shops are open and so on.

The main reason to have them closed is because people need a day off and because union standards demand more pay for working on weekends. So the work hours on sundays are usually shorter. But religion? Not much, no. I don't know anyone who actually goes to church on Sunday.

Date: 2007-11-03 21:08 (UTC)From: [identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com
Or for another example: I think it was -- is? -- illegal for retailers to be open on Sunday in Germany. Probably for Christian reasons originally, but I think when people thought about removing that, they found secular labor protection reasons for not doing so. "If you make it so people can work on Sunday, soon they'll be financially forced to work on Sunday, and next you know we turn into the United States."

Date: 2007-11-05 11:38 (UTC)From: (Anonymous)
Word on the secular work stuff, for sure. it's one of the things I totally give Europe props for: their concept of work weeks, and even works days, makes SO MUCH MORE SENSE.

Date: 2007-11-05 15:07 (UTC)From: [identity profile] pompe.livejournal.com
I don't think it is labor laws in a modern sense but old guild laws.

One reason why Sweden got rid of Sunday limitations was that the soc-dems allied with Big Companies instead of Small Business Owners.

Date: 2007-11-03 21:34 (UTC)From: [identity profile] fanw.livejournal.com
Oh, but state religion is different from personal religion. I bet you'll find a lot fewer Europeans who attend church, believe in God, or believe in Angels than here in the U.S.

Sundays are a day off, like a Bank holiday, but they don't worship banks there.

Date: 2007-11-05 15:10 (UTC)From: [identity profile] pompe.livejournal.com
Well, arguably places like Berlin, Stockholm, Helsinki and London aren't very religious.

Date: 2007-11-05 15:47 (UTC)From: [identity profile] tooth-and-claw.livejournal.com
That's what i'm hearing from people that travelled there. I've stuck to southern europe, except for a short jaunt to Zurich. are you from Germany? I'm actually curious how this is regarded from other european cultures--- it seems like lots of the more northern european states kind of view Spain and Italy as more . . . backward is not the right word, but maybe more traditional?

Date: 2007-11-05 16:14 (UTC)From: [identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com
Pompe's Swedish.

Spain is part of the small but growing gay marriage alliance, FWIW, though not without a fight.

Date: 2007-11-05 20:56 (UTC)From: [identity profile] pompe.livejournal.com
No, I'm Swedish. Sadly I've mostly travelled in the North/West/East, like Germany, Britain, the old East Bloc and of course Norden.

The typical word for southern Europe is probably "catholic", which is supposed to mean rather traditional and sometimes indeed also a bit backward, unfair as it often is. Not that say, Bavaria or Northern Italy is backward nor poor, but a typical Swede probably thinks Catholic equals Papal which in turn they think equals dubious progressiveness.

Profile

mindstalk: (Default)
mindstalk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 45 67
89 10 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-06-12 21:30
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios