mindstalk: (Default)
SF has a notable anti-democratic trend, with Future! Space! Empires! with hereditary rulers and nobles. Asimov's Galactic Empires, Pournelle's CoDominium and Empire, Poul Anderson's empire. Often an empire falls, to be replaced by a second empire.

This hasn't been without rationalization. The usual line is that with poor communications, a feudal structure is good for long-range government. This never felt right, but I was thinking about it in the past day. Really... what? Europe's feudal realms were in rather smaller areas than the Roman Republic at its pre-Imperial height. Roman used pro-consuls and pro-praetors, so there was local autocracy, but appointed by the Senate, not hereditary. And why couldn't a democratic/republican federation handle the needed decentralization? Local governance, representatives sent to the capital. A bit like the early US, or the Commonwealth (though that has a weak Crown still, and had steamships and telegraphs relatively early.)

Date: 2009-06-27 16:45 (UTC)From: [identity profile] foibos.livejournal.com
Next thing you're going to tell me that N. Korea is a democracy...

A definition of "real" democracy that excludes all the ones which have ever existed is meaningless.

Sure, but that's not my definition. I've already mentioned the (proto-)Hellenistic democracy, and other examples in antiquity exist.

Just about the only thing about the Roman Republic that approaches democracy is that they didn't have kings.

Profile

mindstalk: (Default)
mindstalk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 45 67
89 10 1112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-06-19 09:04
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios